Login

 

Forgot password?
Strategy

Main distinguishing features of warfare of the future lie in qualitative content of engagement systems and their information support. Evolution of maritime operations at the epoch of ocean-going nuclear missile fleet.

Vote
Is there any connection between Russian Navy's development rates and Olympic results?
 Yes
 No
History of votings
piracy submarines Northern Fleet Black Sea Fleet Russian Navy Pacific Fleet Sevmash shipbuilding India Ukraine Bulava Neustrashimy Baltic Fleet Zvezdochka Somalia France procurements hijacking Admiral Gorshkov Arctic Arctic Sea contracts trials incident Sevastopol shipyards anti-piracy Nerpa Admiral Kuznetsov NATO search and rescue Faina Gulf of Aden exercise coast guard history visits Georgia crime accident Yury Dolgoruky Kamchatka frigate US Navy Mistral Indian Navy Far East Russia-Venezuela Crimea missiles hostages Admiral Chabanenko aircraft carrier Russia fishery developments shipwreck Somali Medvedev naval science MiG icebreakers Atalanta aircraft Japan drills Abkhazia naval aviation Vikramaditya aviation presence investigations air disaster conflict Greece war in Ossetia Dmitry Donskoy Mediterranean weapon Russia - India defense order tankers escort Admiral Tributs St. Petersburg Vysotsky Admiral Vinogradov Sicily shipbuilding factory overhaul The Baltic Sea Fleet Sobol Varyag researches South Korea admirals The Pacific Fleet Kilo class Severnaya Verf Admiralteyskie Verfi nuclear subs Zapad-2009 China Vladivostok Borei corvettes provocation Italy BrahMos North Korea marines Sakhalin Lada Yantar utilization innovations The Black Sea Caspian Flotilla reforms Chinese Navy Admiral Nakhimov helicopters Black Sea export victories French Navy USA Pyotr Veliky Akula FRUKUS Novorossiysk destroyers aircraft carriers Tu-142 Indonesia Yushchenko Norway Germany Putin Sebastopol Estonia International Maritime Defence Show IMDS 2009 Kursk delivery Sineva Antarctic Singapore Popovkin Manoeuvres Vietnam

 

Search
New publications newThe information about France's consent to sell Mistral-class helicopter carrier to Russia aroused panic in Georgia, Ukraine and Baltic states, although according to Secretary of Russia's Security Council Nikolai Patrushev "now it is not a time to speak of non-made decisions". Mistral sails into the Sea of Policy.
newSenior lieutenant Roman Shilov, chemical officer of large ASW ship Admiral Panteleev was born in Leningrad. Even though all his relatives were beyond the military, having finished four years in school he enrolled in Kronshtadt Naval Cadet Corps. The Kronshtadt Background.
newNew in-service ships have been added. Publications history
What articles do you want to read?
Our friends russian navy weapons world sailing ships
 
Tell a friend Print version

Stray monsters at sea

V. Valkov, RusNavy.com editor
18.02.2009

Two nuclear submarines collided deep in the Atlantic at the beginning of February: the Royal Navy’s HMS Vanguard and the French Le Triomphant. The two ships are nuclear submarines, and both are armed with nuclear warheads. Each has a water displacement of approximately 15,000 tonnes and a length of 150 meters. They are real underwater monsters: It is no coincidence that from time to time whales surreptitiously approach them and hide under their keel, trying to “talk.”

The collision of two subs under water is a rare occurrence, since modern submarines are fitted with the most advanced equipment allowing them to “see” and “hear,” to “talk” and “be heard.” The ships had on board very experienced crews and were carrying real patrolling, not war exercises, and they were located at substantial distances from their bases (Le Triomphant needed three days to return to its base near the French city of Brest). It was a miracle that the incident did not result in serious damage and that none of the more than 200 British and French sailors died.

So what caused the collision? The defense ministries of the two countries have cited as the main reason behind the collision the “exclusively perfect noise reduction technology of the two ships,” which allowed them to become “invisible” to one another. But, wait a minute.

Invisibility is a required an essential battle characteristic of any submarine, and this characteristic is really not that absolute in these two ships to the point where they would be incapable of noticing each other.

The not-so-well-trained crew? That is possible. The British Telegraph, citing a senior naval officer, wrote: “The culture of the submarine service is at a critical level, and the leadership of the Royal Navy needs to understand that. The satiation is unlikely to be fixed quickly,” quoting comments made by an anonymous source.

Hydrology conditions in the zone of the incident could also have played a role. It is possible that the noise generated by surface targets -- fishing trawlers, passenger liners, and cargo ships -- confused the instruments aboard the submarines: that is possible.

Nonetheless, in my opinion, the main reason behind the incident is to be found somewhere else: the two ships (NATO members) were conducting their patrols on cross courses without the slightest knowledge about it! We understand that it was not for the sake of testing each other’s capabilities or increasing their combat potential that two submarines, whose weapons, by the way, are trained in one (I assume and guess in which) direction, stumbled into one another in the Atlantic absolutely by chance.

This means that members of the alliance are not sharing situation maps, and are hiding secrets from each other.

Hence the stray monsters are sailing the oceans. Only whales consider them their own.