Login

 

Forgot password?
Vote
Is there any connection between Russian Navy's development rates and Olympic results?
 Yes
 No
History of votings
piracy submarines Northern Fleet Black Sea Fleet Russian Navy Pacific Fleet Sevmash India shipbuilding Ukraine Neustrashimy Bulava Baltic Fleet Somalia Zvezdochka France procurements Admiral Gorshkov hijacking Arctic Arctic Sea contracts trials incident Sevastopol shipyards anti-piracy Nerpa Admiral Kuznetsov NATO Gulf of Aden Faina search and rescue coast guard exercise history visits Crimea Yury Dolgoruky Russia Mistral Far East crime Kamchatka hostages frigate missiles Georgia accident Indian Navy Russia-Venezuela developments US Navy shipwreck drills fishery Medvedev Somali MiG Admiral Chabanenko aircraft carrier Japan Abkhazia Atalanta investigations aircraft icebreakers naval science Dmitry Donskoy naval aviation aviation Vikramaditya presence Greece conflict Varyag war in Ossetia air disaster Mediterranean weapon tankers Russia - India overhaul nuclear subs shipbuilding factory escort St. Petersburg Sicily Sobol The Baltic Sea Fleet Admiral Tributs defense order Vysotsky Admiral Vinogradov Kilo class North Korea South Korea Vladivostok Admiralteyskie Verfi Zapad-2009 China utilization The Pacific Fleet marines researches Severnaya Verf admirals export Yantar Novorossiysk Yushchenko Yanukovich Lada USA Sakhalin Caspian Flotilla provocation Borei strategy Putin innovations BrahMos Italy The Black Sea corvettes Pyotr Veliky aircraft carriers Baltic Sea reforms destroyers Indonesia Chinese Navy Germany industry Caesar Kunikov Admiral Nakhimov Black Sea Norway Vietnam ransom Sebastopol Tu-142 Akula French Navy victories FRUKUS helicopters Sineva Popovkin Manoeuvres

 

Search
New publications new Reportedly, the Mistral deal has been 'basically' done, although continues to evoke contradictory reactions both in Russia and in NATO. Military analyst Viktor Litovkin comments the situation.
new Director of Harvard Black Sea Security Program Sergei Konoplev denies expert opinion that "Black Sea is the U.S. sea".
Publications history
What articles do you want to read?
Our friends russian navy weapons world sailing ships
 
Tell a friend Print version

Russia to expand naval presence in the Mediterranean Sea

Source: en.rian.ru, author: RIA Novosti military commentator Ilya Kramnik


Peter the Great

A squadron comprising the nuclear-powered battle cruiser Peter the Great, the anti-submarine warfare (ASW) ship Admiral Chabanenko and two supply ships from the Russian Navy's Northern Fleet recently entered the Mediterranean Sea.

The squadron was joined there by the Russian Baltic Fleet's escort ship Neustrashimy (Intrepid) and a Black Sea Fleet tanker Ivan Bubnov.

For the first time since the break-up of the Soviet Union, Russia has reinstated a scaled-down version of the famous Fifth Squadron comprising warships from the three "western" fleets" that had sailed the Mediterranean in the U.S.S.R.'s heyday.

After exercising in the region, the Northern Fleet squadron will sail to Venezuela. The Neustrashimy will go to Somalia; and the empty Black Sea Fleet tanker will return to her home base in Sevastopol.

For over 200 years, the Mediterranean Sea has played an important part in Russian history. During the Russo-Turkish War of 1768-1774, Admiral Grigory Spiridov (1713-1790) commanded a naval squadron that defeated the Turkish fleet during the battles of Chios Strait and Cesma Bay in July 1770.

The subsequent blockade of the Dardanelles Strait facilitated Russia's eventual victory in the war.

Throughout the early 19th century, the Russian Navy operated in the Mediterranean Sea. However, France and the United Kingdom defeated Russia in the 1853-1856 Crimean War. Under the 1856 Paris Peace Treaty, Russia was forced to scrap its Black Sea Fleet and could only dispatch Baltic Fleet squadrons to the region.

Russian expeditions had both psychological and practical implications. Famed English writer, poet, soldier, courtier and explorer Sir Walter Raleigh (1552-1618) used to say that those who owned the sea controlled global commerce, while those controlling global commerce owned the Earth and its riches.

This may be an overstatement which, nonetheless, reflects the real situation. Naval superiority facilitates unimpeded merchant-marine traffic and makes it possible to destroy enemy shipping.

British and U.S. naval superiority was a major factor of the Allied victory in both world wars.

In peacetime, naval superiority provides substantial commercial advantages to individual countries or groups of countries.

Since the late 16th century, the Anglo-Saxon world, namely, the United Kingdom and the United States, have dominated the seven seas.

Although Russia has never aspired for naval superiority, it has always tried to maintain a navy capable of undermining superior enemy forces.

In the 19th and 20th centuries, Russian expeditions to the Mediterranean Sea tried to undermine British and Turkish naval superiority. In case of war, Russian squadrons were to have attacked British shipping, while avoiding superior enemy forces. If a war broke out with Turkey, they were supposed to support the Black Sea Fleet's operations aimed at blockading and seizing the Bosporus and the Dardanelles Straits.

International strategies changed with the advent of long-range missiles, nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers. After World War II, Soviet naval squadrons stationed in the Mediterranean Sea were ordered to pin down and destroy NATO carriers and strategic missile submarines in case of a hypothetical conflict, thereby preventing them from hitting targets in the U.S.S.R.

Although tensions have relaxed since the Cold War, and though the United States has scaled down its naval presence in the Mediterranean Sea, this theater of war linking Europe, Asia and Africa retains its key importance.

Moscow, which is showing its naval flag between Port Said in Egypt and the Strait of Gibraltar more and more frequently, obviously realizes the region's strategic importance.