Login

 

Forgot password?
Vote History of votings
Subscription

Modify subscription

submarines shipbuilding Black Sea Fleet exercise Pacific Fleet Russian Navy Northern Fleet strategy cooperation Ukraine visits Russia piracy missiles trials Sevastopol history Sevmash presence contracts drills Baltic Fleet industry incident anti-piracy shipyards training Gulf of Aden frigate Somalia India developments reforms opinion Borei policy procurements Russia - India aircraft carrier Crimea arms exports USA St. Petersburg France financing tests Bulava Yury Dolgoruky Serdiukov US Navy Mediterranean cruise Zvezdochka NATO innovations Indian Navy United Shipbuilding Corporation Medvedev Arctic agreements commission Admiralteyskie Verfi Admiral Gorshkov Mistral Vladivostok accident hijacking corvettes overhaul Russia - France Admiral Kuznetsov anniversary Rosoboronexport Vysotsky event ceremony Yantar Severomorsk defense order negotiations aircraft conflict China deployment naval aviation Putin Black Sea investigations Varyag coast guard Novorossiysk Vikramaditya landing craft Far East crime marines Severnaya Verf meeting scandals memorials traditions Syria Japan escort South Korea statistics Yasen Neustrashimy tenders Admiral Chabanenko convoys Marshal Shaposhnikov Ukrainian Navy problems Severodvinsk Chirkov reinforcement tension tragedy firings technology Baltic Sea frontier service provocation Almaz hostages Caspian Flotilla search and rescue Moskva upgrade court Dmitry Donskoy rumors keel laying Turkey World War II death helicopters Kilo class Admiral Panteleyev Atalanta Kaliningrad shipwreck Petr Veliky Admiral Vinogradov Rubin Norway patrols launching Russia-Norway
Search
Strategy strategy Combat Capability [42%], Role and Missions, Structure of the Navy, in-service ships, surface ships, submarines, chronology.
Our friends russian navy weapons world sailing ships
 
Tell a friend Print version

Home / Russia / Structure of the Navy / Combat Capabilities of Russian and US Navies in 2007

Combat Capabilities of Russian and US Navies in 2007

Types of combatant ships Russian Navy
Amount on the roll

Weight US Navy
Amount on the roll

Weight
Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines
(weighting factor 0, not supposed to attend conventional war) 		27 0 14 0
Nuclear-powered cruise missile submarines
(weighting factor 5) 		8 40 1 5
Nuclear-powered attack submarines
(weighting factor 5) 		15 75 53 265
Diesel-electric submarines
(weighting factor 3) 		18 54 - -
Aircraft carriers
(weighting factor 6) 		1 6 12 (13) 72 (78)
Guided missile cruisers
(weighting factor 4) 		5 20 22 88
Guided missile destroyers
(weighting factor 3) 		23 69 54 162
Guided missile frigates
(weighting factor 3) 		15 45 30 90
Corvettes
(weighting factor 1) 		140 140 8 8
Amphibious ships
(weighting factor 1) 		10 10 35 35
Mine countermeasures ships / minesweepers
(weighting factor 2) 		12 (?) 24 8 16
Total 274 483 237 741 (747)


Despite outclassing US Navy by 37 ships, Russian Navy yields to it in combat capability by 34% primarily because of misbalance, i.e. insufficient number of nuclear-powered attack submarines and surface ships of basic classes.

REMARKS


1. Combat capability herein is overall index of military parity displaying quantitative and combat power ratio between Russian Navy and US Navy which is the world's largest fleet. Some components and parameters of both navies were not considered.

2. The figures may differ from official (real) quantity. The table was made only on the basis of publicly open sources.

3. As long as amount of ships on the roll is much greater than combat-ready ones, real balance of combat capabilities may differ.

4. Information shown in the table expresses combat capabilities of classes and single ships not in full. Detailed description can be found on Central Navy Portal webpages.

5. Weighting factors are used for comparative assessment of various types of warships.

Combat Capabilities - 2011
Combat Capabilities - 2010
Combat Capabilities - 2009